CHARACTERISTICS and OUTCOMES of SARS-COV-2 BREAKTHROUGH INFECTIONS among DOUBLE and TRIPLE VACCINATED PATIENTS with INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Background: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines offer the most effective way to reduce the risk of severe COVID-19. Recent data indicate sufficient immune response after vaccination in most patients with infammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) on immunomodulatory treatments. Objectives: To investigate the clinical profile of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections among double and triple vaccinated patients with IRD. Methods: Data from the German COVID-19-IRD registry, collected by treating rheumatologists between February 2021 and January 2022 were analysed. Patients double or triple vaccinated against COVID-19 ≥14 days prior to proven SARS-CoV-2 infection were identifed, and type of IRD, vaccine, immunomodulation, comorbidities and outcome of the infection were compared with 737 unvac-cinated IRD-patients with COVID-19. Results: In total, 271 cases of breakthrough infections were reported, 250 patients (91%) had received two doses of vaccines, 21 (9%) patients three. More than 70% of the patients received Pfzer/Biontech vaccine for the frst, second and third vaccination. The median time from second/third vaccine dose to infection was 148 days (range 14-302) days. Most of the patients were diagnosed with infamma-tory joint diseases (Table 1). Most of the patients were treated with methotrexate (Table 1). The use of Januskinase inhibitors(i) was more frequently reported in double vaccinated patients (10.4% vs 4.8%), whereas tumor necrosis (TNF)i were reported more often in triple vaccinated patients (33.3% vs. 22.8). Hospitalisation rate was higher in unvaccinated IRD-patients than in vaccinated ones, while fatality rate was similar in unvaccinated and double vaccinated patients. Although the rate of comorbidities and median age were higher in triple-vaccinated patients, infected patients showed a lower rate of hospitalisation, neither COVID-19 related complications, nor the need of oxygen treatment or death. Conclusion: In this cohort of triple-vaccinated IRD patients no fatal courses and no COVID-19 related complications were reported, although median age and rate of comorbidities were higher compared to double-vaccinated and unvacci-nated patients. These results support the general recommendations to reduce the risk of severe COVID-19 disease by administering three doses of vaccine, especially in patients with older age, presence of comorbidities, and on immuno-modulatory treatment.

COVID-19 in RITUXIMAB TREATED PATIENTS with INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES

Background: At the beginning of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the influence of anti-infammatory therapy on the course of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with infammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) was unknown. In the meantime, several data indicate an association of severe courses of COVID-19 with the use of ritux-imab (RTX). Objectives: To gather further knowledge about SARS-CoV-2 infections in RTX-treated IRD patients, data from the German COVID-19-IRD-registry were analysed. Methods: Hospitalisation was used as a surrogate of COVID-19 severity. Baseline characteristics, disease features, medication and outcome of COVID-19 were compared in RTX-treated inpatients and outpatients. Results: In total, 3592 cases were reported in the registry, which included 130 RTX patients (3.6%) for our analysis. RTX-treated inpatients were older than RTX-treated outpatients (median age 63 y vs 56 y, p=0.007). Patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis treated with RTX (n=32) showed a significant higher COVID-19 related hospitalisation rate (33% vs 11%, p=0.005), which was not the case for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (49% vs 50%). Cardiovascular comorbidities were reported more frequently in hospitalised RTX-treated patients (20% vs. 6%, p=0.032). More than 50% of the RTX-treated inpatients developed COVID-19 related complications, e.g. acute respiratory distress syndrome. The median time period between the last RTX treatment and SARS-CoV-2 infection was shorter in inpatients than in non-hospitalised patients (3 (range 0-17) vs. 4 months (range-29), p=0.039). The COVID-19 related mortality rate was 14% (n=19) in RTX-treated IRD patients. In RTX-treated inpatients and outpatients, there were no relevant differences with respect to the use of concomitant glucocor-ticoids or other disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, disease activity, median last RTX dose or median number of immunomodulatory drugs prior to RTX treatment. Conclusion: In addition to general risk factors, such as age and comorbidities, it is already known that IRD patients treated with RTX show a higher rate of severe COVID-19. In our registry, RTX-treated patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis appear to be at even higher risk to develop severe COVID-19 compared to other IRD. Moreover, the shorter the time since the last RTX treatment, the higher seems to be the risk of developing severe COVID-19. This might be explained by a more profound B-cell depletion in the frst weeks after RTX treatment warranting further studies.

EVALUATION of the USE of VIDEO CONSULTATION in GERMAN RHEUMATOLOGY CARE before and during the COVID-19 PANDEMIC WAVES

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic telemedicine tools rapidly and widely gained acceptance as indispensable management tools for the continuum of clinical care in rheumatic diseases. They have been adopted in position papers and guidelines for the management of rheumatic diseases in adult patients. Objectives: Evaluation of the use of video consultation as one form of tele-medicine before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated lockdowns among Rheumatology physicians in Germany. The survey results are expected to support the optimization and implementation of video consultation (VC) into routine clinical practice in rheumatology, providing long-term benefts for both parties, patients and their treating rheumatologists. Methods: Cross-sectional nationwide online survey among German rheumatolo-gists and rheumatologists in training. The survey was promoted by newsletters sent by means of mail and Twitter posts to members of the German Society for Rheumatology (n=1,650) and German Professional Society for Rheumatology (n=527). Results: Reported data refer to 205 participants. The majority of respondents was male (59%), older than 40 years (90%) and specialized in internal medicine/rheumatology (85%). They were divided into two groups: 'digital users' (38%) and 'digital non-users' (62%). Users employing telemedicine (TM) but never VC were defned as 'TM-users' (10%). Those using TM and VC were classifed as 'VC-users' (27%). 'Non-users' negated the use of VC and TM respectively. Knowledge on telemedicine was self-rated as 4 (median on a Likert Scale 1 (very high) to 6 (very low)) with a signifcant difference between user (VC-user 2.7±1.2, TM-user 3.2±1.1) and non-user (4.4±1.3). The Figure 1 shows a signifcant increase in the use of VC during the lockdown periods. Even between the lockdown phases, VC use was higher than in the pre-pandemic phase. Reasons for VC non-use in TM-user and non-user were administrative/technical efforts (21%), lack of technical equipment (15%), time constraints (12%), time required for individual VC sessions (12%), inadequate reimbursement (11%), lack of demand from patients (11%), data security concerns (9%), poor internet connection (8%), and lack of Scientific evaluation/evidence (5%). Based on the experience gained, physicians considered the following clinical situations to be particularly suitable for VC: follow-up visits (VC-user 79%, TM-user 62%, non-user 47%), emergency consultations (VC-user 20%, TM-user 33%, non-user 20%), and patients presenting for the frst time (VC-user 11%, TM-user 19%, non-user 8%). Conclusion: Despite the fact that the current pandemic situation, with social distancing and several lockdowns, provides an ideal environment for the implementation of new remote care forms such as VC, their use and acceptance remained below expectations. Given the reported decline in physician face-to-face consultations during the pandemic, these fndings are even more concerning. The identi-fed reasons for non-utilization should be addressed by policy makers, payers and medical societies to provide better foundations for future innovative care models.

ONE YEAR of DIGITAL HEALTH APPLICATIONS (DIGA) in GERMANY-RHEUMATOLOGISTS' PERSPECTIVES

Background: Based on given legislation (ŞŞ 33a and 139e SGB V, Social Code Book V) the German approach to digital health applications (Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen, DiGA) allows reimbursed prescription of approved therapeutic software products (listed in the DIGA directory https://diga.bfarm.de/de/verzeichnis) for patients since October 6th, 2020. Objectives: To evaluate the level of knowledge on DiGA among members of the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) after one year of DiGA under the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic using the DiGA Toolbox of the 'health innovation hub' (hih), a think tank and sparrings partner of the German Federal Ministry of Health. Methods: Anonymous cross-sectional online survey using LimeSurvey (https://limesurvey.org). The survey was promoted by newsletters sent out to DGRh newsletter recipients and Twitter posts. Ethical approval was obtained. Results: 75 valid participants reported that they care more than 80% of their working time for patients with rheumatic diseases. Most were working in outpatient clinics (54%) and older than 40 years of age (84%). Gender distribution was balanced (50%). 70% were aware of the possibility to prescribe DiGA. Most were informed on this for the frst time via trade press (63%), and only 8% via the professional society. 46% expect information on DiGA from professional societies and the medical chambers (36%) but rarely from the manufacturer (10%) and the responsible ministry (4%). Respondents would like to be informed about DIGA via continuing education events (face-to-face 76%, online 84%), trade press (86%), and manufacturers test accounts (64%). Only 7% have already prescribed a DiGA, 46% planned to do so, and 47% did not intend DiGA prescriptions. Relevant aspects for prescription are given in Figure 1. 86% believe that using DiGA/medical apps would at least partially be feasible and understandable to their patients. 83% thought that data collected by the patients using DiGA or other digital solutions could at least partially influence health care positively. 51% appreciated to get DiGA data directly into their patient documentation system resp. clinical electronic health record (EHR) and 29% into patients' owned EHR. Conclusion: DiGA awareness was high whereas prescription rate was low. Mostly, physician-desired aspects for DiGA prescriptions were proven efficacy and efficiency for physicians and patients, risk of adverse effects and health care costs were less important. Evaluation of patients' barriers and needs are warranted. Our results will contribute to the implementation and dissemination of DIGA.

The influence of the SARS-CoV-2 lockdown on patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases on their adherence to immunomodulatory medication: a cross sectional study over 3 months in Germany.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the adherence of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) to their immunomodulatory medication during the three-month lockdown in Germany. METHODS: From 16th March until 15th June 2020, IRD patients from private practices and rheumatology departments were asked to answer a questionnaire addressing their behaviour with respect to their immunomodulating therapy. Eight private practices and nine rheumatology departments that included rheumatology primary care centres and university hospitals participated. A total of 4252 questionnaires were collected and evaluated. RESULTS: The majority of patients (54%) were diagnosed with RA, followed by psoriatic arthritis (14%), ankylosing spondylitis (10%), connective tissue diseases (12%) and vasculitides (6%). Most of the patients (84%) reported to continue their immunomodulatory therapy. Termination of therapy was reported by only 3% of the patients. The results were independent from the type of IRD, the respective immunomodulatory therapy and by whom the patients were treated (private practices vs rheumatology departments). Younger patients (<60 years) reported just as often as older patients to discontinue their therapy. CONCLUSION: The data show that most of the patients continued their therapy in spite of the pandemic. A significant change in behaviour with regard to their immunomodulatory therapy was not observed during the three months of observation. The results support the idea that the immediate release of recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology were well received, supporting the well-established physician-patient relationship in times of a crisis.

Does tnf-inhibition decrease the risk of severe COVID-19 in rmd-patients

Background: Patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) might have an increased risk for infection due to their immunomodulatory treatment, secondary to their disease and comorbidities. Recent studies suggest a decreased risk of severe COVID-19 in RMD-patients treated with biologics. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess courses of RMD patients treated with TNF-inhibitors (TNF-I) included in the German COVID-19 registry. Methods: In the German physician-reported COVID-19-RMD registry, patients with an RMD and confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infection were documented (data entered between March 30, 2020 and January 30, 2021). We analysed TNF-I treated patients, their course and outcome of the infection. Data were compared to RMD-patients treated with other immunomodulatory drugs (OID) than TNF-I. Results: A total of 269 patients were treated with a TNF-I (57% female) compared to 874 patients who were treated with OID (68% female). Median age was 52 years (range: 19-87) in the TNF-I-group versus 58 years (range: 18-91) in the OID-group. Rheumatoid arthritis was the most common diagnosis (38% in TNF-I-group vs. 52% in the OID-group), followed by ankylosing spondylitis (32% vs. 6%), psoriatic arthritis (22% vs. 11%) and other RMD (9% vs. 31%). Adalimumab (35%) and etanercept (35%) were the most frequently used TNF-I (tab. 1). Glucocorticoids (GC) were used in 22% of TNF-I-treated patients and in 42% of the OID-group. Under TNF-I, stable disease was reported prior to the SARS-CoV-2-infection in 53% of the patients (OID-group: 47%), followed by low disease activity in 35% (OID: 34%), moderate disease activity in 6% (OID: 12%) and high disease activity in 4% (OID: 3%). Most frequent comorbidities were arterial hypertension (29% under TNF-I vs. 35% under OID), diabetes (8% vs. 11%) and cardiovascular diseases (7% vs. 12%). The most common reported COVID-19 symptoms were dry cough (57% vs. 55%), fever (53% vs. 61%) and fatigue (50% vs. 49%). Hospitalization due to SARSCoV infection was required in only 12% of the TNF-I-treated cases vs. in 29% in the OID-group. Oxygen treatment was necessary in 5% of the patients under TNF-I compared to 22% under OID and invasive ventilation in 2% in the TNF-Igroup compared to 6% under OID. Most notably, no fatal courses of COVID-19 were reported among the 269 RMD-patients treated with TNF-I versus 49 deaths in the 874 cases (5.6%) treated with OID. Focussing on the hospitalizated TNF-I patients, the rate of concomitant GC use (p<0.001) and higher disease activity (p=0.005) was significant higher (tab.1). Conclusion: High or moderate RMD-disease activity is an important factor associated with severity of COVID-19 including mortality. In this large cohort RMD patients treated with TNF-I show a low hospitalisation rate and no fatal course. This is reassuring for patients and treating rheumatologists to use TNF-I to control RMD disease activity. The use of glucocorticoids and high disease activity seem to counteract possible protective effects of TNF-I.

Disease activity and pain levels are not influenced by the current COVID19 pandemic in patients with rheumatic diseases in germany-data from the german COVID-19 patient survey

Background: The current pandemic constitutes an entirely new situation for patients as well as physicians. The insecurity of the early phase, shutdowns, increasing infection rate and appearing SARS-CoV2 mutations have created a situation that makes live difficult especially for chronic diseases i.e. patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMD) and their treating physicians. The psychosocial burden that is created by this special situation is completely unknown and is estimated to be higher in patients than in the general population. Objectives: In order to measure the impact on our patients, the German COVID19-Rheuma patient survey was set up in April 2020, during Germany's first shut down. Methods: The German COVID19-Rheuma patient survey is a patient reported longitudinal online survey where patients with RMD who registered between April and July 2020 are asked on a monthly base using an online survey on social, personal, medical factors, whether a COVID19 infection occurred, isolation measures were changed and scores regarding stress and anxiety are recorded. Between April and July 2020, 637 patients registered and completed a first survey. Up to January 2021, about 400 patients are still enrolled. Here we present an interim analysis of the first 6 months regarding patients that were enrolled in April and May during the first shut-down. This first analysis compares the situation in the first lockdown to July, a phase with very low infection numbers in Germany, and to November, the beginning of the second lockdown. Results: 150 patients (87% female) were enrolled in April/early May 2020. Mean age was 48 years (range 11-89). The majority of patients suffered from rheumatoid arthritis (51%), followed by psoriatic arthritis (17%), other spondyloarthropathies (10%) and connective tissue diseases (10%). The majority of patients received antirheumatic therapies: 32% glucocorticoids (GC), 31% cDMARDs, 21% TNF inhibitors, 7% Jak inhibitors, and 9% other biologicals. Of the patients treated with GC, 25% were on GC monotherapy. In the first lockdown, 26% of patients were working remotely and 24% were self-isolating (doubles included). Additionally, 48% were using masks that were not mandatory at that time and 41% were using disinfection in a regular manner. The rates for remote work and self-isolation did not change significantly over time while the mask use increased to 98% with the official obligation to do so. The use of disinfectants increased to 88% in November. Regarding disease activity, no change in patient global assessment could be observed over time (4.3 ± 2.5 vs. 4.0 ±2.6 and 4.0 ± 2.5). Self-reported pain was also stable over time as were sleep disturbances. While 48.2% of patients who were receiving physiotherapy paused in April, only 10 and 14% did so in July and November, respectively. 11% of the patients paused their medication in the first lockdown, whereas only 2.75% did so in July and 3.4% in November. Contact with the treating rheumatologist was maintained over time in the majority of cases. Conclusion: While in the beginning of the pandemic the insecurity was considerable and the concern that the fear for infection would lead to inadequately treated patients with RMDs, we here show for the first time that on the one hand our patients were timely in taking adequate measures to keep themselves safe (e.g. self-isolating, mask use) and adapted to the clinical situation in not pausing their medication. Altogether, in this alert cohort, the pandemic did not lead to an increase of patient-reported disease activity in the first six months.

Do patients with rheumatoid arthritis show a different course of COVID-19 compared to patients with spondyloarthritis?

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) are the most common inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD). The aim of this study was to elucidate differences in the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection in RA- and SpA-patients. METHODS: Data from the German COVID-19 registry for IRD patients from 30th March to 16th November 2020 were analysed. 208 RA and SpA patients were included in the study, matched for gender and age. RESULTS: 104 SpA patients (40% patients with ankylosing spondylitis, 54% with psoriatic arthritis and 6% with enteropathic arthritis) were compared to 104 RA patients. For both groups, median age was 56 years. TNF-i treatment was reported in 45% of the SpA and in 19% of RA patients (p=0.001). Glucocorticoids were used in 13% of the SpA and in 40% of the RA patients (p=0.001). In both groups, the majority of the patients (97% SpA, 95% RA) recovered from COVID-19. Hospitalisation was needed in 16% of the SpA and in 30% of the RA patients (p=0.05), and oxygen treatment in 10% and 18% respectively (p=ns). Three versus six (p=ns) fatal courses were reported in the SpA versus the RA group. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed that the hospitalisation rate during COVID-19 infection, but not the mortality, was significantly higher in RA as compared to SpA patients. This could be explained either by different treatment strategies or by different susceptibilities of the two diseases.

[Statement of the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) on the use of video consultations in rheumatology]. / Stellungnahme der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie e. V. (DGRh) zur Anwendung der Videosprechstunde in der Rheumatologie.

For several years video consultations have been regarded as a new form of medical healthcare infrastructure, in addition to personal doctor-patient contacts and have also been partly promoted. The COVID-19 pandemic brought unexpected topicality and attention to the use of video consultations. The National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung) decided on special regulations in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, which reduce previous obstacles to the use of telemedicine and video consultations (and also partly of conventional telephony). The present statement of the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) on the use of video consultations is intended to give an overview of in which form and with which limitations video consultations can be used in rheumatology in Germany. It sketches an outlook on how video consultations can undertake which functions in rheumatological care in the future.

OLDER AGE, CARDIOVASCULAR COMORBIDITY AND GLUCOCORTICOSTEROIDS ARE RISK FACTORS FOR COVID-19 HOSPITALISATION IN PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES: FIRST RESULTS OF THE GERMAN COVID-19-IRD REGISTRY

Background:Patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) and infection with SARS-CoV-2 may be at risk to develop a severe course of COVID-19. To gather knowledge about SARS-CoV-2 infections in IRD patients, a national registry was established to elucidate IRD specific profiles of COVID-19.Objectives:To identify risk factors for hospitalisation.Methods:Patients from the German registry on SARS-CoV-2 infection in IRD were analysed. Patients are enrolled with a pre-existing IRD and a positive lab-result for a SARS-CoV-2 infection. The main outcome parameter was hospitalisation versus non-hospitalisation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Covariates included in the model were age group, gender, key comorbidities (cardiovascular, lung diseases, chronic renal insufficiency), prior and/or current use of glucocorticosteroids (GC) or NSAIDs and remission.Results:Until May 17th, 2020, data from 192 IRD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported (67 males;124 females;1 diverse). 64 patients were hospitalised, 21 patients were ventilated non-invasively/invasively and 15 patients died.Baseline characteristics are shown in table 1, stratified into the patient groups non-hospitalisation, hospitalisation without ventilation, and hospitalisation with ventilation. Non-hospitalised patients were younger, had less comorbidities and were less often treated with GC. In the group of hospitalised patients compared to non-hospitalised patients more patients were male (42% vs 32% male) with an even higher proportion in the ventilated patient group (57% male).In the multivariable logistic regression model, age65 years (OR 5.1;95%CI 2.3-11.4), cardiovascular comorbidity (OR 2.3;95%CI 1.0-5.0), and prior and/or current treatment with GC (OR 2.6;95%CI 1.2-5.4) were independently associated with hospitalisation.Parameter, N (%)Non-hospitalisation 128 (66.7)Hosp. without ventilation 42 (22.4)Hosp. with ventilation 21 (10.9)Age [years], mean (SD)53.8 (13.4)65.2 (15.5)69.7 (9.9)Female87 (68.5)28 (65.1)9 (42.9)RA60 (46.9)24 (55.8)12 (57.1)Psoriasis23 (18)3 (7)3 (14.3)Axial spondyloarthritis14 (10.9)2 (4.7)0Lupus7 (5.5)1 (2.3)0Remission of IRD67 (52.3)23 (53.5)4 (19)Number of comorbidities, mean (SD)1 (1.2)1.8 (1.4)2.4 (1.5)Cardiovascular disease42 (32.8)25 (58.1)16 (76.2)Pulmonary disease16 (12.5)8 (18.6)8 (38.1)Chronic renal insufficiency5 (3.9)7 (16.3)4 (19)Cancer2 (1.6)4 (9.3)2 (9.5)Obesity (BMI30)23 (18)5 (11.6)3 (14.3)Diabetes3 (2.3)7 (16.3)4 (19)Other comorbidities20 (15.6)9 (20.9)6 (28.6)csDMARD (without HCQ)59 (46.1)25 (58.1)8 (38.1)HCQ13 (10.2)1 (2.3)2 (9.5)bDMARD48 (37.5)15 (34.9)8 (38.1)tsDMARD5 (3.9)1 (2.3)1 (4.8)Glucocorticosteroids47 (37)29 (67.4)13 (61.9)NSAIDs21 (16.4)5 (11.6)1 (4.8)Conclusion:As has been described for COVID-19 in general, also in IRD male gender may be associated with a more severe course of the infection as the descriptive analysis of data shows. Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection-dependent hospitalisation in IRD patients include age (65 years), cardiovascular comorbidities, and prior and/or current treatment with GC.Disclosure of Interests:Anne Regierer Speakers bureau: Novartis, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Rebecca Hasseli Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Consultant of: Pfizer, Gilead, Novartis, Celgene, Abbvie, Medac, Bimba Hoyer: None declared, Andreas Krause: None declared, Hanns-Martin Lorenz Grant/research support from: Consultancy and/or speaker fees and/or travel reimbursements: Abbvie, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Celgene, Medac, GSK, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Janssen-Cilag, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly. Scientific support and/or educational seminars and/or clinical studies: Abbvie, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Celgene, Medac, GSK, Roche, Chugai, Novartis, UCB, Janssen-Cilag, Astra-Zeneca, Lilly, Baxter, SOBI, Biogen, Actelion, Bayer Vital, Shire, Octapharm, Sanofi, Hexal, Mundipharm, Thermo Fisher., Consultant of: see above, Alexander Pfeil Grant/research support from: This study Investigator Initiated Study “Automatic assessment of jo nt space narrowing in rheumatoid arthritis based on the Post-hoc analysis” (number: IIS-2016-110818) is a part of the of the Investigator Initiated Study “The quantification of inflammatory related periarticular bone loss in certolizumab pegol treated patients with rheumatoid arthritis” (number: IIS-2014-101458) which is supported by UCB Pharma GmbH, Monheim, Germany., Jutta Richter Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline and UCB Pharma for performing the LuLa-study., Tim Schmeiser Speakers bureau: Actelion, UCB, Pfizer, Christof Specker Consultant of: Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chugai, Lilly, Novartis, Sobi, UCB, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Toshiba, Anja Strangfeld Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Reinhard Voll: None declared, Hendrik Schulze-Koops: None declared, Ulf Müller-Ladner Speakers bureau: Biogen

[SARS-CoV-2 & rheumatic disease : Consequences of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. A comparison of the recommendations for action of rheumatological societies and risk assessment of different antirheumatic treatments]. / SARS-CoV-2 & Rheuma : Konsequenzen der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie für Patienten mit entzündlich rheumatischen Erkrankungen. Ein Vergleich der Handlungsempfehlungen rheumatologischer Fachgesellschaften und Risikobewertung verschiedener antirheumatischer Therapien.

The recommendations of the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh) update, which update and expand the guidance on the management of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases in view of SARS-CoV­2 created at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, correspond in many points with the recommendations for action of the American (ACR) and European (EULAR) societies, but also differ in some points. Therefore, this article discusses the core recommendations of the DGRh update on the prevention of SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19, the risk assessment for inflammatory rheumatic diseases and the use of antirheumatic treatments in the context and in comparison to the ACR and EULAR recommendations, and provides an overview of the risk assessment of individual antirheumatic drugs.

[Current guidance of the German Society of Rheumatology for the care of patients with rheumatic diseases during the SARS-CoV-2/Covid 19 pandemic]. / Aktuelle Handlungsempfehlungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie für die Betreuung von Patienten mit rheumatischen Erkrankungen während der SARS-CoV­2/Covid 19-Pandemie.

In the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic there are many questions regarding the safe treatment of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Many of these questions cannot yet be answered on an evidence-based basis and this does not make patient care easy. The German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) hopes that these initial recommendations will provide support for specific issues in the care of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases in view of the current threat posed by SARS-CoV-2. In order to take advantage of the dynamic worldwide gain in knowledge for our patients, the recommendations will be updated regularly. The updated versions of the recommendations are deposited on the homepage of the DGRh.